Product safety issues have been the topic of much debate in the United States for
more than 50 years. Most of these issues deal with the presence of lead or another toxic
compound and the resultant toxicity in common consumer goods. The strong correlation
between ingested or inhaled lead compounds and neurological damage, delayed mental
and physical development, learning disabilities, and other problems in humans is well
documented.
Today, more than ever, the issue of toxicity in consumer goods is at the forefront
of both public and corporate debate. Several factors have contributed to the rise in
prominence of this issue: the outsourcing of the manufacture of inexpensive goods, the
sometimes indiscriminant recycling practices of other countries that add lead to an
otherwise innocuous mixture or component, and the extensive media coverage
surrounding the issue. In response to the heightened awareness, a number of legislative
and regulatory initiatives have been put forth. These new requirements and restrictions
may negatively affect businesses that are not prepared or that do not fully understand the
regulations. For example, toy maker Mattel, Inc. and its Fisher-Price subsidiary recently
agreed to pay a $2.3 million civil penalty for allegedly importing and selling toys with
excessive levels of lead.